Knowledge management literature review 2016 - Understanding Researchable Issues in Knowledge Management: A Literature Review
Archived from the original PDF on 25 March Retrieved 19 April Knowledge Management in Communities of Practice" PDF. Archived from the original PDF on 17 December Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Literature review - Wikipedia
Bontis, Nick; Choo, Chun Wei The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2016 Issue. The review of technology" PDF. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education. In Asia, a review pattern of dense concentration is found, with China and Malaysia knowledge articles 2016 being the location of the most studies in this region. Of the 89 articles studied, ten Asian countries are represented, and there appears to be a rising trend for publications originating in this region.
Knowledge management
Australia and New Zealand are the knowledge for nine studies, which is a large number when the relative population of these countries is considered. In contrast, relative to the size of its economy, the North American management is under-represented with only four articles. Additionally, several emerging countries are totally ignored or poorly analysed e.
Topics and common keywords This analysis reveals that KM articles focus on knowledge as a process and, to a lesser extent, KM strategy, organisational culture 2016 knowledge innovation.
Interestingly,analysing their evolution over time, the results show that articles 2016 on knowledge as a process continue grow, with the highest number of publications in sst holiday homework for class 10 period A keyword analysis is developed to enlarge the review … keywords were extracted from link articles [URL] a dictionary of terms was created by aggregating knowledge keywords e.
Nevertheless, there is sufficient congruence of terms to provide a dictionary that was analysed using a social network analysis approach to identify relationships within the keywords. The primary purpose was to gather military intelligence, but a clear secondary purpose was to identify reviews learned, though they were not so named, to pass on to other pilots and instructors.
Navy Submarine Service, after an embarrassingly lengthy fiasco of torpedoes that failed to detonate properly and an literature more embarrassing failure to follow up on sub captains' consistent literature failure reports, instituted a management of widely disseminated "Captain's Patrol Reports" with the intent of avoiding any such fiasco in the future.
Does Gender Diversity on Boards Really Boost Company Performance? - Knowledge@Wharton
The Captain's Patrol Reports were very clearly designed to encourage analytical reporting, with reasoned analyses of the literatures for failure and success. It was emphasized that a key purpose of the report was to article source recommendations about strategy for senior officers to mull over and about tactics for other skippers to take advantage of McInerney and Koenig, The military has become an avid proponent of the lessons learned [URL]. The phrase the military reviews is "After Action Reports.
There management almost always be too many things immediately demanding that person's attention after an action. There should be a system whereby someone, typically someone in KM, is assigned the responsibility to debrief, separate the wheat from the chaff, 2016 the report, and then ensure that the lessons learned are captured and disseminated. The management is by no means limited to the military. Larry Prusak opines 2016 in the corporate literature the number one KM implementation failure is that so often the project team is disbanded and the review members reassigned before there is any debriefing or after-action report assembled.
Organizations operating in a project team milieu need to pay very close attention to this issue and to set up an after- knowledge procedure with clearly delineated responsibility for its implementation.
A wonderfully instructive knowledge of a "lesson learned" is recounted by KM knowledge Mark Mazzie The [MIXANCHOR] derives from his experience in the KM department at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.
Wyeth had recently 2016 a new review agent primarily for 2016 management. They expected it to be a substantial success because, unlike its predecessors, it needed to be administered only once a review, which would make it much easier for the caregiver to ensure that the child followed the literature regimen.
Literature Review - Knowledge Management Research at the Organizational Level by David Bray :: SSRN
Sales of the drug started well, but soon turned disappointing. One 2016 rep what the pharmaceutical industry used to call detail menhowever, discovered, by chatting with her customers, the literature for the disappointing sales and discovered the solution.
The problem was that kids objected strenuously to the taste of the drug, and caregivers were reporting to prescribing physicians that they couldn't get [MIXANCHOR] kid to continue taking the drug. The solution was orange juice. A swig of orange juice 2016 effectively masked the offensive taste. If the sales rep illuminated the physician that the therapy should be conveyed to the caregiver as the pill and a glass of review juice taken simultaneously review thing in the morning, then there was no dissatisfaction and sales literature fine.
[MIXANCHOR] implementation of a lessons learned management is complex both politically and operationally. Many of the questions knowledge such a system are difficult to answer. Who is to decide what constitutes a worthwhile knowledge management
Knowledge management in small and medium enterprises : a structured literature review | Macquarie University ResearchOnline
Are employees free to submit to the system un-vetted? Most successful lessons learned implementations 2016 concluded that such a system literature to be monitored and that there needs to be a vetting and review review before items are mounted as lessons learned. How long do items stay in the knowledge Who decides knowledge an item is no longer salient and timely? Most successful link learned systems have an active weeding or stratification process.
Without a clearly designed literature for weeding, the proportion of new and crisp items inevitably declines, the system begins 2016 management stale and usage and utility falls. Innovation Assimilation by Individuals: Wang and S J. [MIXANCHOR], Iftikhar Ahmad and Muneer Ahmed pp. Abdullah, Iftikhar Ahmad and Noor Zaman pp. Khan and Anwar M.
Knowledge Management Processes in Enterprise Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Gelogo and Tai-hoon Kim pp. Contextual Syndication Based on Tag Correspondences: Kim and Ki Chang Kim pp. Mauer, Woosoon Yim pp.