Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent.
Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among research obtained from all terms. Does not tie paper information. Paper rubrics not flow and appears to be created from research issues.
Headings are necessary to link concepts. Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited.
All web sites utilized are authoritative. All web sites utilized are credible. Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Citations Cites go here data obtained from other sources.
APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.
Cites most data obtained from other sources. Cites paper data obtained from other sources. Citation research is either inconsistent or incorrect.
Does not cite sources. The term is missing significant information. Thinking Arguments are pertinent to the rubric.
Arguments are logical, and supported with evidence. The key arguments have been made - no major points have been left out. Arguments are pertinent to the topic. Arguments are fairly logical and reasonably supported.
Most key arguments have been made. Arguments are not consistently pertinent, logical or supported. Few key arguments have been made. Arguments rarely, if at all, logical and supported.
Almost no key arguments have been made. Interest Factor Language and style appropriate for intended [URL]. Paper presents well-developed analysis and synthesis. There is nuance, inference and subtlety to the paper. Main points are memorable.
Language and style of paper appropriate.