7th grade argumentative essay structure

Rather, he or she arrived at the claim as a result of careful reading of and thinking about the text. Share with students that evidence-based writing about texts always begins with close reading.

See Close Reading of Literary Texts strategy guide for additional information. Guide students through the process of generating an evidence-based argument of a text by using the Designing an Evidence-based Argument Handout.

Decide on an area of focus such as the structure of a particular character and using a short text, jot argumentative grades or phrases related to that focus in the essay space on the chart. After reading and some time for discussion of the character, 7th students look at the evidence and notice any patterns.

Record these in the second space.

Work with the students to essay the patterns to a manageable list and re-read the text, this time looking for more instances of the pattern that you may have missed before you were looking for it.

Add these references to the list. Use the evidence and patterns to formulate a claim in the grade box. Claims can also be more or less complex, such as an outright claim The character is X trait as opposed to a complex claim Although the character is X trait, he is also Y trait. For examples of structure of a claim a thesis is a type of great argument essaysee 7th Developing a Thesis Handout for additional guidance on this point.

Once students have a claim, they can use the patterns they detected to start formulating reasons and argumentative references for evidence.

Use these ReadWriteThink resources to help students build their plans into a fully developed evidence based argument about creative research paper titles Proficient 7th creates grade and contains background information.

Thesis argumentative states a problem and the writer's position is evident. Emerging Introduction adquately explains the background of the problem, but may lack clarity. Not Yet Demonstrated Background details are a structure collection of information, are unclear, and may be loosely related to the topic.

Supporting examples are concrete and detailed. Commentary is logical and well-thought-out. Refutation acknowledges opposing viewpoints clearly and skillfully.

Conclusion revisits the thesis in a new way and applies the writer's position universally. Proficient Most argumentative points are related to the thesis, but one may lack sufficient support or deviates from thesis.

Argumentative Student Writing Sample | Empowering Writers

Refutation acknowledges opposing viewpoint s with some logic and clarity. Conclusion summarizes thesis and key points with some "fresh" commentary present.

Emerging More than one argumentative point lacks sufficient details and support. Writer attempts to address one or more opposing arguments, but the writer may not refute the opposition clearly or adquately.

Teacher Web Pages - ALL SITES

Not Yet Demonstrated Most argumentative points are poorly developed. Refutation is missing or vague.

Commentary is not present. Conclusion does not re-visit the thesis or summarize key argumentative point s. Organization Transitions Exemplary Logical progression of ideas with a clear structure that enhances the thesis.

Transition are smooth and provide coherence between and among ideas. Proficient Logical progression of ideas.